Nerman Fatic vs Cezar Cretu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs C. Cretu

Nerman Fatic

BIH

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

225

C. Rank

388

191

Best Rank

288

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Cezar Cretu

ROU

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

225

C. Rank

388

191

Best Rank

288

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 0 Cretu

They have played 4 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 4 and Cezar Cretu winning 0. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Cezar Cretu was at the Brasov Challenger, 06-07-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	2
Cretu	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(QF) Brasov Challenger(07-06-24)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Cezar Cretu

(R2) M25 Antalya(02-25-22)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Cezar Cretu

N. Fatic vs C. Cretu H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	C. Cretu
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$0
58.47% (404-287)	Career Total W/L	68.18% (300-140)
2	Clay	0
12	Titles	11
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	100.00% (1-0)

N. Fatic vs C. Cretu Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 45.47% of points on their second serve, while Cezar Cretu has won 41.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cezar Cretu has won 45.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.11% and 30.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cezar Cretu has saved 52.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 72.31% of matches played (W/L 47/18), with Cezar Cretu winning 66.67% (W/L 52/26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Cezar Cretu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 261/114), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 36/24).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as Cezar Cretu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.21% of matches (W/L 41/15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 2 times and Cezar Cretu being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 4 and Cezar Cretu winning 0.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Cezar Cretu was at the Brasov Challenger, 06-07-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:1.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 323.83 while Cezar Cretu has played against players with an average rank of 506.27.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cezar Cretu has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cezar Cretu has converted 42.99% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Cezar Cretu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs C. Cretu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	C. Cretu
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
25	Games Won	18
2	Aces (Total)	2
4	Total Double Faults	5
1:46:1	Average Match Time	1:46:1
64% (70/109)	1st Serve %	61% (84/138)
77% (54/70)	1st Serve Win %	58% (49/84)
59% (23/39)	2nd Serve Win %	56% (30/54)
46% (6/13)	Break Pts Won %	100% (3/3)
43% (59/138)	Return Points Win %	29% (32/109)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Cretu Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Maia Challenger - 24-11-2025
R1 Lorenzo GiustinoL. Giustino	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Q3 Carlos Sanchez JoverC. Sanchez	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Q1 Tiago CacaoT. Cacao	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
Montemar Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Marco TrungellitiM. Trungelliti	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
R1 Federico BondioliF. Bondioli	W	7-6(2) 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs C. Cretu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	C. Cretu
58.47% (404/287)	YTD Win/Loss	68.18% (300/140)
57.49% (890/658)	Sets Win/Loss	63.88% (635/359)
53.03% (7602/6734)	Games Win/Loss	55.35% (5123/4132)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	60.00% (36/24)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	69.60% (261/114)
43.48% (20/26)	Indoor Hard W/L	60.00% (3/2)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.18
1598	Aces Total	801
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
1517	Total Double Faults	884
1:20:1	Average Match Time	1:26:48
509.47	Average Opponent Rank	475.73
66% (23791/35820)	1st Serve %	64% (15460/24102)
65% (15579/23791)	1st Serve Win %	66% (10157/15460)
48% (5772/12029)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (4323/8642)
47% (1969/4222)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1346/2885)
43% (15618/36165)	Return Points Win %	44% (10789/24481)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	100.00% (4/0)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/2)
52.89% (119/106)	Challenger W/L	53.52% (38/33)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	71.07% (258/105)
60% (394/662)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	68% (292/431)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (51/96)
54% (102/189)	Deciding Set Win %	65% (81/125)
88% (394/348)	1st Set Won, Won Match	92% (277/255)
11% (394/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	8% (277/22)
19% (297/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	27% (161/43)